|
|
Post by Brochfael on Jan 25, 2011 16:05:13 GMT -1
Arthur Pendragon and his group LAW (Loyal Arthurian Warband) have put out a statement via Facebook in which he 'names and shames' those groups who have not supported wholeheartedly his campaign to have reburied cremated human remains excavated from Stonehenge and currently being analysed by Sheffield University. The statement is available at: The page describes those who oppose Arthur's stand as traitors and pseudo-Druids/Pagans. I'm very curious to know what people on here think of this posting. |
|
|
|
Post by nellie on Jan 25, 2011 17:07:44 GMT -1
I'm not sure how to comment on the statement except to say that it doesn't read incredibly well...
As to Arther Pendragon - I didn't know who he was so went off to do a google search (as you do). Does he REALLY consider himself to be THE Arthur Pendragon or is that misinformation?? The whole issue of reburials aside, I'd find it difficult to take a man who believes he's King Arthur seriously in any circumstance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jan 25, 2011 17:20:01 GMT -1
Arthur in dickhead shocker
|
|
|
|
Post by Sìle on Jan 25, 2011 18:24:03 GMT -1
I honestly have difficulty comprehending what he is saying in his statement, other than naming and shaming people for not supporting him (and being praised for it in the comments section by people who are saying they want to stay out of "personal vendettas"). Odd, very odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by arth_frown on Jan 25, 2011 20:46:50 GMT -1
He is sounding desperate. Reading between the lines, it's looks like he is losing support.
|
|
|
|
Post by arth_frown on Jan 25, 2011 20:58:08 GMT -1
If Arthur believes he is reincarnation of king Arthur, then he believes in reincarnation.
How can there be guardians of stonehenge if they have been reincarnated? Unless he is picking and choosing who has been reincarnated to suit his argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamguardian on Jan 26, 2011 0:53:12 GMT -1
I honestly have difficulty comprehending what he is saying in his statement, other than naming and shaming people for not supporting him (and being praised for it in the comments section by people who are saying they want to stay out of "personal vendettas"). Odd, very odd. The IMO, the blokes a dick but I found lady vinamarie duguay's comments even more bizarre. WTF is she on?? |
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jan 26, 2011 5:27:21 GMT -1
oh... well she is a right rollocking happy person isnt she? im sure she dropped into reality briefly, started to post and clearly got swept up again into her own little world part way through.
maybe in a week or two she will be back from pluto.
|
|
|
|
Post by redraven on Jan 26, 2011 7:52:04 GMT -1
Can't get the link to work unfortunately.
RR
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamguardian on Jan 26, 2011 12:59:59 GMT -1
oh... maybe in a week or two she will be back from pluto. That soon? |
|
|
|
Post by Sìle on Jan 26, 2011 17:39:52 GMT -1
Can't get the link to work unfortunately. RR It appears to have been deleted.  |
|
|
|
Post by Heron on Jan 26, 2011 19:42:35 GMT -1
Can't get the link to work unfortunately. RR Or, rather, fortunately  |
|
|
|
Post by Sìle on Jan 26, 2011 21:40:03 GMT -1
Um, nope. Just tried it again and it's still there.  |
|
|
|
Post by redraven on Jan 27, 2011 8:24:11 GMT -1
Can't get the link to work unfortunately. RR Or, rather, fortunately After reading the link Sile generously provided, it would appear you were right Heron, good grief!!! RR |
|
|
|
Post by Tegernacus on Jan 28, 2011 19:21:20 GMT -1
Apparently, so story goes, he used to put on raves/free-parties in a ruined castle, and his possee called him "King John". Then one day, he read a book on Arthur, and decided it suited him more, so he changed to King Arthur.
Then, presumably, after a decade of drug abuse and cult-of-personality, he figured he must actually BE King Arthur, and so changed his name. It all smacks of "wannabe" and "playacting", just like much of druidry.
|
|
